10-26 13:03 - 'Poker player loses £7.7 million in winnings after Supreme Court rules he cheated. US gambler Phil Ivey loses case against London casino Crockfords after five-year legal battle.' (independent.co.uk) by /u/terrycarlin removed from /r/news within 0-10min
Phil Ivey (famous poker playehigh stakes gambler) just lost a decision in the UK Supreme Court. Here's an article about it. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2017/oct/25/poker-player-phil-ivey-loses-court-battle-over-77m-winnings-from-london-casino Essentially, Ivey asked for a bunch of specific changes to the game that allowed him to edge sort. The casino agreed to these terms. He won about $10 million while playing, but the casino never paid him. He sued for the money and lost. How would this have gone over in the US? Dependent on state? Know of any similar circumstances?
Online casinos have their fair share of problems, but those who decide to do business in brick-and-mortar establishments are not carefree either. It sometimes happens that the very players they entertain antagonize with the casino and both parties involved claim that they are right. Not so long ago, Phil Ivey was involved in a huge scandal involving casinos on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, after the house accused him of cheating. A court is yet to reach a definitive conclusion but it looks like the poker professional has a strong hand, therefore a decent chance at winning. On the other hand, we have online casinos such as Ladbrokes who try to expand their business over the Internet and replicate the success of land-based establishments. This particular company started with a popular bookmaker United Kingdom and is now running both sports betting and poker. Meanwhile, one of their competitors who operates in London and goes by the name of Les Ambassadeurs is being sued by a highroller. Iraj Parvizi is overly concerned about the fact that the casino failed to do the due diligence and prevent his opponents from colluding at poker games. The stakes were as high as they get, which means that the player from Dubai lost a lot of money as a result of the casino not doing its job. It is too early to determine whether he's right or wrong, but after the player lost in excess of €200,000 playing poker one night, tension is mounting. He refused to pay the casino and in return, the house filed a suit, which means that the case will be decided in a court of law. Not only Parvizi refuses to pay the six digit amount but he intends to claim €10 million that he lost over the course of time. To be more precise, he had been playing here for four years in a row and allegedly Craig Stevens who is in charge of running high-stakes poker games was behind the conspiracy. The masseuses he higher went beyond the call of duty and signaled players during the game, so that they called an unfair advantage over their competitors. The allegations are quite serious and if the casino is found guilty, the consequences will be severe. There are of course some who claim that the only reason for why Parvizi lost so much money playing poker is that he is a mediocre player best with more money than skills and common sense. from via Casinoreviews
Things were bound to turn nasty in the scandal between poker professional Phil Ivey and Atlantic City's Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa. The two parties refused to settle, after the poker player was accused of cheating as a result of taking advantage of a flaw in the deck of cards. Ivey claimed that he did nothing wrong and simply played the game, while paying attention to details and cashing in on his extraordinary power of observation. On the other hand, the casino officials are trying to convince the media and eventually the judge that the PokerStars Team Pro cheated. He was allegedly in cahoots with a female companion and used a trick to identify the high-value cards in the game of baccarat, therefore increasing his chances to win. This is not the first time that Phil Ivey is accused of wrongdoing by casinos and baccarat tables, with Crockfords Casino in London claiming refusing to pay almost $10 million. They invoke a similar scenario and claim that they were cheated by the poker professional, with that case being also under investigation. It is a bit surprising that despite all the publicity that these scandals receive, casinos are reluctant to prevent him from playing baccarat and only react when Ivey wins. Throughout the gaming community, players are not surprisingly taking his side, although there are some who accept the fact that Phil got an unfair edge over the casino. The poker player made it crystal clear that he admits no wrongdoing and accuses the casino of trying to get away with a clear violation of its own rules. Instead of contacting the Division of Gaming Enforcement they decided to allow him to play and only after he scored the big win, took action. The case is very sensitive and apparently Borgata has very few rock solid arguments to use against Ivey, which explains why Phil refused to settle. Obviously, the Missouri-based gaming card manufacturer Gemaco is the one to blame for the incident, because the product was faulty. It goes without saying that the land-based casino in Atlantic City will pursue this company for the damages caused. Meanwhile, they are trying to avoid the worst-case scenario in which they have to pay Phil Ivey a considerable amount. Only time will tell whether they will convince a judge or if the poker professional will take what he considers to be rightfully his. from via Casinoreviews
One year ago, Phil Ivey was involved in a massive scandal, after Crawford Casino in London accused him of cheating in a high-stakes game of baccarat. The poker professional is frequently playing at nosebleed limits and he won and lost millions as baccarat tables, but his performance in London was simply dazzling. After his stripped the local casino of millions of euros, the establishment decided not to pay him a dime and instead accused him of collusion with employees, cheating and unfair practices. The details of that scandal transpired in the media, but many months have passed and a resolution is yet to be made. Meanwhile, Phil Ivey and a friend who goes by the name of Sun, took on Borgata, a high-class casino in New Jersey. Once again, they sat down at the baccarat tables and made specific requests, such as to have a croupier who speaks Mandarin, an automatic shuffling machine and Gemaco playing cards. At least in theory such a precise list of demands would raise the alarm flags, but baccarat players are known to be very superstitious people. As a result, the casino representatives didn't hesitate to provide Phil Ivey with everything he asked for, which eventually led to their downfall. The reason for why the poker professional asked for these things is that he found a flaw in the Gemaco cards. Apparently, these playing cards are not properly cut and a keen observer can distinguish between different gems on the edge of the cards. After undertaking comprehensive research, Ivey got pretty good at identifying cards and this gave him a certain edge over the casino. The pair played for several hours and over this course of time they lost big pots, but overall it was obvious that they were making a lot of money. Once again, it took a while for the Borgata officials to realize something is not right and put an end to the games, eventually understanding the method used by Phil and his friend. Now that they realized the mechanism used by the poker player to gain an advantage over the casino, they intend to sue him. It goes without saying that Borgata refuses to pay the winnings and hopes that a judge will rule in their favor. The problem is that Ivey didn't do anything wrong and the fact that they had a precise list of demands makes no difference. At the end of the day, the dealer was working for the casino, the automatic shuffling machine was theirs as well, not to mention that it was Borgata who chose to introduce Gemaco cards in their venue. from via Casinoreviews
Phil Ivey has plenty of legal problems to worry about, with some casinos filing lawsuits against him, in an attempt of stripping him of what he considers to be rightfully his. The poker professional won millions of dollars playing baccarat in London and Atlantic City, but both casinos are unwilling to pay. They claim that Ivey cheated, or at least used something they call edge sorting, by taking advantage of a flaw in the design of playing cards. While his lawyers are calling the casinos sore losers and are very optimistic about Phil's chances of winning the lawsuits, the poker player found the time and resources to help a friend in need. He and Andrew Robl chipped in and paid $2.5 million in bail, to have Wei Seng "Paul" Phua released from custody, as well as his son Wai Kit "Darren" Phua. Before the two poker players paid the bail, the highrollers were under arrest in Las Vegas pending allegations of running illegal poker rings. This is not the first time that Ivey comes to the rescue of fellow poker players, with Daniel Cates joining him a few days ago to pay the bail for the same players. Caesars Palace in Las Vegas called upon the police and told him that the defendants were running an illegal gaming ring and this resulted in the arrest of Wei Seng "Paul" Phua and his son. In addition, Hui Tang was also arrested but as a result of the poker players paying the bail on their behalf, he was promptly released. The two Malaysian poker players are frequently competing in highroller tournaments in Macau and are widely regarded as some of the most successful participants. Ivey considers them to be personal friends and as a result had no hesitations in playing what many would regard as a staggering amount. Even though the three defendants are now out of jail, they are prohibited from gambling and are not allowed to go online either. Those who play poker over the Internet and use gambling companies that also provide them with the option of betting on sports, don't run into similar troubles. Titan Poker serve thousands of customers who appreciate their poker room and also run a successful bookies. In a nutshell, members enjoy the best of both worlds, as they get to play their favorite game and also bet on sports events. from via Casinoreviews
Phil Ivey could face criminal charges in baccarat scandal
Not so long ago, Phil Ivey was mired in another huge baccarat at scandal, but this time it involves Borgata casino in Atlantic City. The poker professional is also a savvy baccarat player and he has no hesitations in competing for millions of dollars at casinos all over the world. One year ago, he won £8 million at the Crockforts Casino in London but the gambling venue refused to pay a dime, claiming that Ivey had been cheating the entire time. At the time of writing, a lawsuit is underway and only time will tell whether Phil will be properly reimbursed or if the casino will get away with it. On the other side of the Atlantic, Ivey needs to find similar allegations, this time as a result of another lawsuit coming from Borgata casino. Their lawyers are trying to build a convincing case, so that Ivey will be forced to repay the significant amount won at their tables after taking advantage of a serious flaw in the deck of cards used by the casino. The cards were manufactured by Gemaco, one of the biggest producers of such items but they had a certain design flaw that Phil Ivey took advantage of. The lawsuit is about edge sorting, which is a highly controversial term that casinos try to associate with cheating, while players and attribute a more positive connotation to it. The bottom line is that none of the two sides are willing to back down and the casino representatives are suggesting that things could even get to the next level. They didn't exclude the possibility of Phil Ivey facing criminal charges, even though such a conviction would be far more difficult than simply recuperating the money. The idea is to keep the poker professional under a lot of pressure and maybe determine him to reach an agreement. On the other hand, Ivey has no intentions to take a step back and he is quite confident in his chances of winning in court. It is anyone's guess what will happen next but the stakes are very high for both parties involved. While Phil is trying to get the money he considers to be rightfully his, the casino industry is frightened by the prospect of the player winning. It could set a dangerous precedent and encourage other players to resort to edge sorting, while a conviction either criminal or civil will have a deterring effect on them. Over the Internet, at least when playing at reputable casinos such Unibet these things are not an issue because everything is ran by a software which renders the risk of cheating virtually nonexistent. from via Casinoreviews
Exactly one year ago, Phil Ivey was threatened by the guys at London's Crockfords casino with a lawsuit, in response to his own action. The poker player who also has a keen eye for baccarat tables, won in excess of €10 million playing this game at the aforesaid casino. Apparently, he used the controversial method that goes by the name of edge-sorting to maximize his chances and when the casino officials found out, they refused to pay his winnings. This was the first time that Phil Ivey got in trouble at baccarat tables, with another scandal starting just a couple of months later and it involves Borgata casino in Atlantic City. That lawsuit is also pending and this doesn't bode well for Ivey who was confident that he would win the first lawsuit in the United Kingdom. Both casinos claim that since the profits were illegally obtained, they were under no obligation to pay them out. Edge-sorting is highly controversial and it implies that the baccarat players take advantage of a faulty design in the playing cards. Phil Ivey realized that he had a rare opportunity of winning a lot of money by exploiting this flaw and he did exactly that. The lawsuit was underway and the United Kingdom High Court reached a verdict last week, claiming that Ivey's edge-sorting is in fact cheating. The judge said that the poker player influenced the croupier and by requesting the cards to be reoriented before loaded into the deck, he cheated. Even though Ivey and his lawyers claim that the casino was willing to please the poker player, the other side testified that at that time, they were not aware of Phil's methods. The casino celebrated his victory as it no longer has to pay a huge amount, but the vast majority of those who monitored the scandal, were disappointed by the verdict. Ivey will file an application to the Court of Appeal, which means that this is not a definitive solution, but the odds are stacked against the poker player. He says that by simply exploiting the failures he offset the proverbial house edge and improved his own chances. It goes without saying that the vast majority of poker and baccarat players were upset with this verdict and even more will probably shift from land-based casinos to online one. At Deuce Club Casino for example, the random number generator and state-of-the-art software handles all the games, rendering the risks of similar scandals virtually nonexistent from via Casinoreviews
Poker player loses £7.7 million in winnings after Supreme Court rules he cheated. US gambler Phil Ivey loses case against London casino Crockfords after five-year legal battle Phil Ivey calls himself "the greatest poker player of all time," but a casino in Atlantic City has accused him of being something else: a cheat. Ivey’s London Other Edge Sorting Problem. A few months before Ivey made $10.1M in New Jersey; he had won $10.2M playing Baccarat at a London-based casino. He had deployed the same tricks handed to him by Cheung—edge sorting. Unlike New Jersey, though, Ivey didn’t leave London with his money. Phil Ivey admitted to using the technique while visiting the exclusive Crockfords Club in Mayfair, central London, in 2012, and insisted he played an "honest game" and had not cheated. Phil Ivey is at battle with Crockfords Casino in London this week, over his punto banco winnings from 2012. (Image: poker-king.com) Phil Ivey was in London this week as his multimillion dollar Phil Ivey was refused his winnings after a London casino said he cheated Mayfair club Crockfords claimed he broke the rules of game punto banco Mr Ivey, the world's top poker player, said he used Poker player Phil Ivey tried to sue London casino Crockfords Club for his £7.7million 'winnings'. But a High Court judge ruled his 'edge-sorting' technique was cheating. A London casino refused to pay Phil Ivey $12.4 million, saying he essentially kept track of card values by watching for design imperfections on the backs of the cards during the game of baccarat. One of the world's top poker players, Phil Ivey, has lost a Supreme Court bid to reclaim £7.7m of winnings withheld by a London casino for five years. London Casino Withholds $11.5 Million Payment to Phil Ivey Friday, October 12th, 2012 | Written by Renee Professional poker player Phil Ivey says he won $11.5 million playing Punto Banco at a London casino, but authorities feel that luck alone couldn’t have been responsible for this win.
Popular Videos - Phil Ivey & Casino Royale - YouTube
tonight i talk about phil ivey who has lost a case against a london casino. this video is all my own work and is not subject to copyright law. Phil Ivey talking to Tatjana Pasalic on Day 1A of the WPT London Full details at http://www.partypoker.com/blog poker Tatjana Pasalic talks to Phil Ivey at W... Judge orders the Phil Ivey to return $10.1 million to the casino.Click here to read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/poker-pro-phil-ivey-repay-... Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. Casino program thats helping people earn $5000 a week look here -- https://goo.gl/2LRf8hPhil Ivey sits down with Showtime to discuss his life, winnings and l... Poker player Phil Ivey loses £7.7m punto banco casino case Poker player Phil Ivey loses £7.7m punto banco casino case Poker player Phil Ivey loses £7.7m punt...
